Only a question..

[jaring0002]

Why is that the Registry Cleaner and Disk cleaner "ON TOOLBOX" better than on the options on "deep care" (deep registry fix and Junk files clean)?

[Late]

What??

 

How do you mean "Better" ??

Finds more errors??

[jaring0002]

It finds more error...:roll:

[Mr Bean]

hi to both .

 

well i disagree ,have the latest ccleaner. (use it a very long time)and today upgraded the AsC4 1.5 ,(remember is a Beta! yet very Very good!)

 

ON my system, found 50 more faults ! that suprized me.I would of shouted thy would be near the same.or there a bouts.

turns out ccleaner was way behind.and I stopped, had a good hard look wondering if this was ok the let it go ahead. and satisfied let it do so .no problems after a reboot.

so if you are using them then I would think thy are evenly matched,and the beta

just a tick better.

 

 

(It finds more errors) ????

 

my advice is this,do not over clean the registry.thy do warn you in the beta

there is no need to over cook it,some here will tel you thy do not clean it to often ,unless you have a slow down of your system,then even then know what you clean out.

I use this once every 4 mounts or so.my preferred method,(of tuning)

but do clean junk files often.

 

Mr Been

[captainron]

I've ran ASC 3 and 4 and full capabilities on every OS it supports and with various hardware like CDMA modems and legacy motherboards. I've yet to see it break anything unlike most windows cleaner products.

 

IOtoobox and the beta 1.5 registry tool still finds more than registry scanner with deep enabled in 3, and daily and deep combined on 4. I've pointed this out before and even did tests in a older thread.

[masterblaster]

When comparing registry cleaners, it's important to note that deeper isn't necessarily better. Registry cleaners either clean too much or not enough.

CCleaner is a great HDD cleaner but they fully admit that their registry cleaning option is not strong when compared to others.

[jaring0002]

Mistakenly didn't post it correctly.. :lol:

 

Why is that the Registry Cleaner and Disk cleaner "ON TOOLBOX of ASC" better than on the options on "deep care" (deep registry fix and Junk files clean)?

[Toppack]

That question appears to Require Extensive Comparison Testing. ;-)

Let us Know the Results when you have completed that. :lol:

[solbjerg]

Hi Toppack

True!

One could test one application and save the report,

Then the other application and save that report

Then some third party applications and save those reports.

Comparing them item by item will probably tell us what parameters are in them and what the difference is between the IObit applications.

Could be that IObit is testing if some parameters will cause trouble in some cases - especially in the beta versions?

Cheers

solbjerg

 

 

That question appears to Require Extensive Comparison Testing. ;-)

Let us Know the Results when you have completed that. :lol:

[captainron]

The best testing method is probably on a VM. Boot the same image, install cleaner, configure it for max depth, and then chart or post results. Make sure MS update, MS restore, and MS indexing are off, as well as any 3rd party real-time tools or suites.