IOBIT RATED BY the sites

[itsmejjj]

http://forums.iobit.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2388&stc=1&d=1257577558

 

http://forums.iobit.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2389&stc=1&d=1257577608

 

 

just did a search on the sites ? as this tread is started by me its my own feeling and findings--

 

why ? to try and settle down the ones who say thy have shifted the io360 from there ratings.

 

well so much thy shifted it--you can downloaded the program from the site clicking download? please and you find you can.

 

now i have stated i do not really worry a bout this but felt i should point this out

no black bans made by them -i could find.-and so it should be--until its trashed out-

also i should point out there is now a new build 1.20-

 

http://forums.iobit.com/showpost.php?p=28813&postcount=5

 

and as far as this lot is concern here is my view--nobody else-- but my thy are nonsense-to suggest a red alert--

 

itsmejjj

[Maxxwire]

No green or yellow at McAfee yet, they're still seeing red . BTW a yellow Reputation Rating on WOT is not considered a good rating, but rather one of caution. A green rating on WOT and McAfee is considered a good rating.

 

~Maxx~

[Maxxwire]

as i use ,and try any thing--then decide for myself-

link to any thing i want-and care less what shows up on screen

 

Since you have such distain and contempt for ratings sites like WOT maybe you should ask the Original Poster why he started this thread in the first place.

 

~Maxx~

[itsmejjj]

to all Members or reader that visit iobit forum--not braking the rule i made--

I do not know what is advised by the other member--as we made a agreement.and I block the posts-made by the member

i do not want a other flare up,and be ticked of again

 

http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4741

is the warning given - this is my own--and my personal opinion..only--nothing to do with nothing--

 

ok now lets get on with this thread --

 

 

 

 

 

i would like to add to the findings

 

i my case i do not suggest you out there not to use the Mention sites -if you feel thy are of use to your safety .or a Gide---

 

for my self -well no,use to me as thy cant identify my systems to start of with .that points out to ME thy Snoop for info--or need verification to the link making it.-perhaps cookies or what ever-sorry i do not allow it--

but you may. refer here please-

http://forums.iobit.com/showpost.php?p=28813&postcount=5

 

myself .have no reason to use them-and as for rating sites wherever, red or green care less,

 

ratings,

depending on or software .or links,of what thy class as dangerous-- as i use ,and try any thing--then decide for myself-

 

link to any thing i want-and care less what shows up on screen-and surf

whats called safe -and Grey ,or the dark . or whatever,as i am protected -99.99% ---

 

MY ADVICE --if you are new to pc -yes go ahead and join -if you feel you do not worry -passing on your PRIVATE information-as in Email address.and where you are located-or what ever you think -allow direct linking-to them

 

TRUST -that is for you to decide-

logs thy make,send you what ever.you decide-

 

as a PC user since the very first one that became public-i think i have a bit of a idea how to take care--BUT TRUST NOTHING.until i feel its sort of OK.

even then pass no private info-

 

(here on the forum grown to trust one Pearson and we share a little very private thinking-(PM) but that's it !)

 

 

MY self as to about warnings,making links-is the risk,that i may be taking,-unless something is not right-i block it.

 

i surf any thing-look for anything--when by my self-but when the" kids"(visit) are around -use a other pc--

 

any how for the ones that like them -USE THEM -if you are one that use the mention site ,good ,and do it -this has no bearing to my posted thread-

as thy still grade our iobit software -there is no boycott made by them.is my point

 

itsmejjj

 

Ps i come back often to my post so to edit any wording to try and make it enplane in corrective English as i can --thank you for understanding this--

Last edited by itsmejjj :

[itsmejjj]

http://www.sofotex.com/cgi-bin/ls/search.cgi?query=iobit&submit=Search!

 

nice ratings here, so there ya go !every one to there own--

but its nice thy do mention our products-

itsmejjj

[itsmejjj]

http://www.snapfiles.com/publishers/iobit-inc/

http://www.ezgoal.com/security/rating.asp?fileid=357644&securitysoftware

http://mobile.vnunet.com/vnunet/downloads/2169573/iobit-smartdefrag

http://www.fileratings.com/Review/IObit_SmartDefrag

http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-02-2009/0005105421&EDATE=

 

ok so if you are into rating this here are a few more i found

now that is what thy say ..so if i may add this --

very simple -BACK UP YOUR PC ---

 

TRY THE PRODUCTS---i still give it a 9/10 rating -but that's just my humble opinion

 

i have stated this before -after the BETAS i have yet to run into a major problem, installing,updates,downloads,the service is very ,very good,

 

look give it a shot ,try the free version

 

ok any one els can add a positive,constructive post please do so--

 

in support--thank you

 

 

itsmejjj

[enoskype]

Here is how it looks at SiteAdvisor as of now.

 

 

http://forums.iobit.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2437&d=1257796604

[Maxxwire]

I know that these Site Advisor ratings mean everything to McAfee users because my friends who use McAfee refuse to go to sites that have a even a yellow caution rating when using a search engine. There are a lot of people who use McAfee and their highest green rating should be courted and not dismissed as unimportant. Its very good news that IObit has Site Advisor's highest rating back!

 

~Maxx~

[itsmejjj]

"Here is how it looks at SiteAdvisor as of now."

 

Must of read Me ya think --well it proved my point -when thy had this stupid red flag ,i wonder what it cost ? in users?

 

that's why i do not take notice of rating sites ,thy swing ,any time -for stupid reasons--

but at least -thy fixed this ---i am still wondering ,when thy allow the use of there software,and,without snooping on downloads,and not have to allow any thing thy want to put on a drive--the freedom to test there software?

 

i have grave reservations ,the other thing fix there downloading site,stop snooping,

and not worry what OS,browser,or system is used-- or tracking cookies.put of drives,what ever explanation thy give-Thy say TRUST us,yet not trust a user ,to tryout there software-you must allow this and that our you do not get a download.

you know ,really don't tell me thy do this to save one downloading ,in case it may not work

itsmejjj

[enoskype]

Here is the comment of the site owner in McAfee SiteAdvisor:

 

http://www.siteadvisor.com/images/logo.gif

 

iobit.com Web site owner comments (1) http://www.siteadvisor.com/images/questionmarkwhite.gif

 

Hello

I am webmaster of IObit.com. More than one week passed since we wrote to you complain the false positive of our website. Did your investigating engineers make any progress? Our website is absolutely clean.

 

Please solve this false positive ASAP.

 

Thanks!

Submitted by iobit at 2009-11-08 06:30:08

 

 

Cheers.

[Maxxwire]

Enoskype- Having McAfee users as friends I have come to know the Site Advisor ratings as a highly trusted barometer of a website's credibility where a green rating represents the 'good as Gold' status that every site seeks. As a long time McAfee user how do you view the Site Advisor ratings and their importance to IObit's public credibility profile?

 

~Maxx~

[enoskype]

Hi Maxxwire,

 

Although like itsmejjj I don't care much, but you are absolutely right for the vast majority of the internet users with SiteAdvisor, name it using Internet Explorer or Firefox.

 

The reason of installing such a software is obvious, ei. to choose the web sites where it shows green-safe, and specifically not red-dangerous.

 

Just to give an example how it is seen, I have given the search results of "IObit" by Google in Firefox with SiteAdvisor add-on.

 

It didn't show any red in the first page.

The yellow one is even forbidden in my case, because of the Hosts prevention.

 

There is a downside though. If there is a change, it is the huge time gap in between safe, unknown, and dangerous states, as we can see in the IObit's case from the site owners comment (It was red until today).

 

 

 

http://forums.iobit.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2441&d=1257806411

 

 

 

 

 

Cheers.

[Maxxwire]

Enoskype- I'm so glad to see that situation concerning IObit's McAfee rating is being rectifying because these ratings are so very important to companies who do business online. I remember not long ago when PC Magazine received a yellow rating from McAfee over an email incident and the publishers at PC Magazine raced to remedy the situation because the poor McAfee rating was so detrimental to their long standing sterling reputation online. Subjective opinions of these Rating Systems may vary, but to the companies involved they are of critical importance.

 

~Maxx~

[usefullll]

Enoskype- I'm so glad to see that situation concerning IObit's McAfee rating is being rectifying because these ratings are so very important to companies who do business online. I remember not long ago when PC Magazine received a yellow rating from McAfee over an email incident and the publishers at PC Magazine raced to remedy the situation because the poor McAfee rating was so detrimental to their long standing sterling reputation online. Subjective opinions of these Rating Systems may vary, but to the companies involved they are of critical importance.

 

~Maxx~

 

Glad about that but there's too much negative reviews on it. But one thing is that Peoples don't really depends on it since it's entirely opinions. The reviews might be accurate at times and It's might not be accurate or even biased reviews. :neutral:. So best is not to depends on such products at all times.

[Maxxwire]

usefullll- For the savvy user like yourself and the people who post here on the IObit Forum that may be the case, but there are a lot more people out there who have little clue as to which sites are good and which might be malicious who use rating services such as WOT and Site Advisor. Every legitimate website doing business on the internet should be very concerned with keeping up their public image and maintaining good ratings on these very popular rating services. This is part of preserving a website's reputation just as is making sure that the truth is known about any negative press that might released whether it be true or not because as they say silence breeds consent.

 

~Maxx~

[Melvin_Deal]

Not just. jjj

 

Avg now at the seme place. Its sad when people cry wolf. I had to completely uninstall Avg just to get here... thats how much theyr'e blocking!

[Melvin_Deal]

Thats right!! Change the subject!! let me fart in your face.

 

What in the Hades are you bickering about. Get over it and remember what this forum was/is/and will be!!! Be nice and play! there are so many threads on so many forums about infighting by people here. its rediculess!! Matters not what sites say here. EH! Quit yor bitching and buy some pads for everyones sake!

[Maxxwire]

Melvin_Deal- What is it that brought on all of this anger and the use of such perverse imagery? I've never known you to loose your temper like this before. Are you implying that IObit should not care about nor defend its public image as reflected in the ratings of these very popular websites? We may not care what WOT and Site Advisor say, but an awful lot of people do and they deserve to know the truth about what has happened and that IObit has not been treated fairly or with accuracy by these ratings sites.

 

~Maxx~

[itsmejjj]

Avg now at the seme place. Its sad when people cry wolf. I had to completely uninstall Avg just to get here... that's how much they're blocking!

 

What is going on with these, Vendors who play GOD ???

or McAfee,or any of the rating sites,

 

your right .my point exactly-stupid is it not(BLOCK a Forum).but that's ratings for ya..

bit like saying,do not swim in sea, as it has sharks in them .

that is my point i do not use rating sites-nor care for them.and the one that Do may be mislead..and are at times.

What do thy imply that a forum is dangerous? PEfff.

 

like i be saying its my opinion only i do not like them --wot or what ever

the trend in the last few years seems to head this way-as people who rely on them start to notice the extreme anti blocking.

 

well i have seen it all now -this on my part is good criticism,

and point to this type ,of false positive ,marketing?

now i hope i am not provoking any one? nor is this my intention-

 

i say this one last time .i care less.one way or the other-and do not use them --wot until 6 days back i never heard of them--

 

 

any one using them as a Gide (rating sites).please go ahead, don't let me tell you different.

 

 

 

itsmejjj

[Maxxwire]

http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr44/Maxxwire_Photos/Album%202/McAfee.jpg

 

Personally I have never paid any attention to nor have I any use for these restrictive and arbitrary ratings systems like so many people around the world who depend on them do, but whether you value their opinion or not one thing is for sure and that is the current voluntarily accepted or ridiculed McAfee rating for IObit.com is as good as gold!

 

And the latest Web of Trust (WOT) ratings continue to improve which can't do anything but good for IObit regardless of anyone's personal opinion of the rating system itself including my own...

 

http://i468.photobucket.com/albums/rr44/Maxxwire_Photos/Album%202/WOT.jpg

 

~Maxx~

[itsmejjj]

Since you have such distain and contempt for ratings sites like WOT maybe you should ask the Original Poster why he started this thread in the first place.

 

~Maxx~

 

ok i give up .what was this about then? (distain and contempt)

and tell me to ask myself?

 

i don't mind Members answer me this is very healthy.and we enjoy the criticism,that is friendly.or agree on something--making it a lovely forum.

 

.please why are you doing this-?

we made a agreement,now here i am again trying to enplane ,and defend.

every time i make a opinion -you attempt to make me look bad, and use strong words-that are not nice, why?

for critas sake , you keep posting at me,why? do not read me,please if you cant see eye to eye.and i understand this.WHY NO PM me instead?

if something upsets you from my posting.

i don't need a other waring.but if this makes you happy i should leave the forum? for the sake of peace.

i shall ask the moderators if this is ok .and use a new name.

[Maxxwire]

jjj- I meant no harm I was simply wondering why you would post a WOT rating when you have such resentment towards these kinds of ratings systems. I hold no value in these ratings systems either and I would have asked this same question regardless of who the original poster was because of the conflict involved in bringing up information that someone holds no value for.

 

You said "every time i make a opinion -you attempt to make me look bad". This is the kind of exaggeration that that blows the meaning of one single comment all out of proportion because I have certainly not commented every time you express an opinion and in this particular case I was certainly not trying to make you look bad. Please take your own advice that you have given to me on many occasions and realize that nothing we discuss here is personal its just about software. Nothing can be accomplished by quitting because things have a way of working themselves out over time and many times great enemies have become great friends in the end.

 

We have a saying that goes like this... "Its better to put on a pair of shoes than it is expect the sidewalk to be padded."

 

~Maxx~

[itsmejjj]

jjj- I meant no harm ok accepted. perhaps i am still twitchy -by your posting-

i get over it-

[solbjerg]

Hi jjj

I think you misunderstand Maxx

Maxx wrote:

"Personally I have never paid any attention to nor have I any use for these restrictive and arbitrary ratings systems like so many people around the world who depend on them do, but whether you value their opinion or not one thing is for sure and that is the current voluntarily accepted or ridiculed McAfee rating for IObit.com is as good as gold!"

 

The only small ambiguous word is "you" which I think I would have changed to "we"

---- whether we (you) value their opinion or not ---

Isn't that the root of your misunderstanding?

I am pretty sure that Maxx uses the "you" as a designation for us all and not for you personally!

Cheers

solbjerg

 

 

 

 

 

 

ok i give up .what was this about then? (distain and contempt)

and tell me to ask myself?

 

i don't mind Members answer me this is very healthy.and we enjoy the criticism,that is friendly.or agree on something--making it a lovely forum.

 

.please why are you doing this-?

we made a agreement,now here i am again trying to enplane ,and defend.

every time i make a opinion -you attempt to make me look bad, and use strong words-that are not nice, why?

for critas sake , you keep posting at me,why? do not read me,please if you cant see eye to eye.and i understand this.WHY NO PM me instead?

if something upsets you from my posting.

i don't need a other waring.but if this makes you happy i should leave the forum? for the sake of peace.

i shall ask the moderators if this is ok .and use a new name.

[Maxxwire]

jjj- I don't mean to offend you in any way by saying this, but somewhere down the line I am hoping that all of this tension between us will pass and we will be at peace with each other.

 

~Maxx~