Proactive protection getting more "smart"?

[raven211]

Not saying it's dumb or anything. :D What I thought about was that I recall a lot of prompts on stuff on my system which was pretty simple. Other behavior blockers (*ehm* ThreatFire *ehm* :D) would just leave it be, as it indeed was nothing to worry about. Sorry, I can't remember things specifically, but we're still just talking in general.

 

What I'm thinking about is the average Joes out there who will probably be very confused only from an added service dialouge with the proactive protection, and I like the same operation as they do; only warn me if absolutely necessary. Who knows, maybe pure whitelisting (of services being added) need to be implemented?

 

I always expect that its "smartness" will improve, but I just had to make sure. ;)

[Irineos]

Yeah, I totally agree. From What I have seen so far IObit Security 360 is a great program and the one of the few improvements it can have is the improving of the the Protection. I white list is really needed as it shows me a image if I want to allow this program to run every once in a while.

[vman]

Thats the downside to behavior blockers like threatfire. For the average joe, well, poor guy...lol

 

 

But as for the heuristics on iobit360, its kind of like Malwarebytes i was told. Small, yet extremely efficient. Though, with heuristics, there is always room for error, which is the downside.

 

 

You cant have the good without the bad i guess.

[Ranana_Tesk]

Proactive protection getting more "smart"

 

It would appear that Singapore is also being proactive about this melamine business... I can't locate the article now... darn.