Why is Smartdefrag so different from Auslogics?

[MacPeter]

Hi everybody,

 

I know that Smartdefrag is still being developed. And as an experienced beta tester I know that problems will always arise. That not the issue. The problem is that nobody pays attention to beta testers and to what they report. A good example:

 

"13 files and three directories with 0 fragmented files." Everybody knows what I am talking about.

 

Right after defragging with Smartdefrag(3 seconds after) I used Auslogics with the following results:

 

_____________________________________________

 

Total files: 1,288,976

 

Total directories: 25,225

 

Fragmented files: 561

 

 

Defragmented files: 561

 

 

Skipped files: 0

 

Fragmentation before: 1.71%

 

Fragmentation after: 0.00%

 

________________________________________________

 

To me it looks quite different from those 13 files, 3 directories and 0 files fragmented!!!??

 

I still think Smartdefrag is better and can prove it but why nobody is paying any attention to the beta testers.

 

Don't give me an explanation such as "bad install":) ...if so, why is Auslogics running smoothly?

[colion]

Hi everybody,

 

I know that Smartdefrag is still being developed. And as an experienced beta tester I know that problems will always arise. That not the issue. The problem is that nobody pays attention to beta testers and to what they report. A good example:

 

"13 files and three directories with 0 fragmented files." Everybody knows what I am talking about.

 

Right after defragging with Smartdefrag(3 seconds after) I used Auslogics with the following results:

 

_____________________________________________

 

Total files: 1,288,976

 

Total directories: 25,225

 

Fragmented files: 561

 

 

Defragmented files: 561

 

 

Skipped files: 0

 

Fragmentation before: 1.71%

 

Fragmentation after: 0.00%

 

________________________________________________

 

To me it looks quite different from those 13 files, 3 directories and 0 files fragmented!!!??

 

I still think Smartdefrag is better and can prove it but why nobody is paying any attention to the beta testers.

 

Don't give me an explanation such as "bad install":) ...if so, why is Auslogics running smoothly?

 

Similar experience comparing SmartDefrag vs. Window's defrager.

[yanvasgrc]

SmartDefrag

 

I have used SmartDefrag and this program works perfect!!. Its capabilities made my computer to work quicker and I think that this program although its a beta version it works better than other relevant programs. I have suggested it to my friends and also I suggest it to everyone who wants a fast working computer.

 

yanvasgrc

8)

[MacPeter]

How do you explain that so many users have this problem?

 

We did not make it up.:)

 

By the way, are you running XP or Vista?

[solbjerg]

Hi MacPeter

Is it a problem??

Different defraggers have different parameters and running two after each other will yield different results - also if you reverse the order in which they are run.

Cheers

solbjerg

 

 

 

How do you explain that so many users have this problem?

 

We did not make it up.:)

 

By the way, are you running XP or Vista?