Jump to content
IObit Forum
Top Free Driver Updater Tools Best 25 PC Optimization Software Best 22 Antimalware Best 22 Uninstaller Software IObit Coupons & Discount Offers PC Optimizer Mac Boost Advice IObit Coupons A Good Utility Program From IObit IObit Promo Codes IObit Coupon Codes IObit Coupons and Deals FAQs Driver Booster Pro Review

Why is Smartdefrag so different from Auslogics?


Recommended Posts

Hi everybody,

 

I know that Smartdefrag is still being developed. And as an experienced beta tester I know that problems will always arise. That not the issue. The problem is that nobody pays attention to beta testers and to what they report. A good example:

 

"13 files and three directories with 0 fragmented files." Everybody knows what I am talking about.

 

Right after defragging with Smartdefrag(3 seconds after) I used Auslogics with the following results:

 

_____________________________________________

 

Total files: 1,288,976

 

Total directories: 25,225

 

Fragmented files: 561

 

 

Defragmented files: 561

 

 

Skipped files: 0

 

Fragmentation before: 1.71%

 

Fragmentation after: 0.00%

 

________________________________________________

 

To me it looks quite different from those 13 files, 3 directories and 0 files fragmented!!!??

 

I still think Smartdefrag is better and can prove it but why nobody is paying any attention to the beta testers.

 

Don't give me an explanation such as "bad install":) ...if so, why is Auslogics running smoothly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everybody,

 

I know that Smartdefrag is still being developed. And as an experienced beta tester I know that problems will always arise. That not the issue. The problem is that nobody pays attention to beta testers and to what they report. A good example:

 

"13 files and three directories with 0 fragmented files." Everybody knows what I am talking about.

 

Right after defragging with Smartdefrag(3 seconds after) I used Auslogics with the following results:

 

_____________________________________________

 

Total files: 1,288,976

 

Total directories: 25,225

 

Fragmented files: 561

 

 

Defragmented files: 561

 

 

Skipped files: 0

 

Fragmentation before: 1.71%

 

Fragmentation after: 0.00%

 

________________________________________________

 

To me it looks quite different from those 13 files, 3 directories and 0 files fragmented!!!??

 

I still think Smartdefrag is better and can prove it but why nobody is paying any attention to the beta testers.

 

Don't give me an explanation such as "bad install":) ...if so, why is Auslogics running smoothly?

 

Similar experience comparing SmartDefrag vs. Window's defrager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SmartDefrag

 

I have used SmartDefrag and this program works perfect!!. Its capabilities made my computer to work quicker and I think that this program although its a beta version it works better than other relevant programs. I have suggested it to my friends and also I suggest it to everyone who wants a fast working computer.

 

yanvasgrc

8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi MacPeter

Is it a problem??

Different defraggers have different parameters and running two after each other will yield different results - also if you reverse the order in which they are run.

Cheers

solbjerg

 

 

 

How do you explain that so many users have this problem?

 

We did not make it up.:)

 

By the way, are you running XP or Vista?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...